“Toxic Shame” Excuse

img_20150708_222014.jpg

Rid yourselves of all the offenses you have committed, and get a new heart and a new spirit. Why will you die, people of Israel? For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Sovereign Lord. Repent and live!

-Ezekiel 18:31-32, NIV

How does the “toxic shame” excuse work?

It is actually rather simple:

It generally operates a means to distract from the real task–i.e. repenting of adultery. The excuse–e.g. “I can’t talk about my cheating on him because I’m going into that shame-place again (Woe is me!)”–plays on the sympathy and pity of pastors and counselors. It is counting on them to make the cheater’s pain or distress of experiencing “shame” more important than the distress the cheater inflicted or continues to inflict on his or her victim. This is problematic from a pastoral stand point because the cheater is using this excuse to avoid doing what is required to find spiritual life–i.e. repent of the sin.

Please, do not fall for this trick and certainly do not tolerate its implementation!

The godly priority is upon repentance. And it is actually the antidote to shame. By repentance, we demonstrate through the power of the Holy Spirit that the sin is no longer who we are (e.g. I Corinthians 6:11, Titus 3:3, etc.). God cleanses us from our sins.

However, this process does not happen if we refuse to repent.

Someone choosing to use the “toxic shame” excuse is refusing to repent. He or she is choosing to characterize his or her sin as inevitable as opposed to something he or she could have chosen otherwise.

It is just what a wretched soul like myself does. I can’t help myself.  I am such a slut. Woe is me!” That is the idea.

That is a lie. A cheater could have chosen otherwise. But they did not. Instead, they made bad, sinful choices that harmed their spouses greatly. Those choices and actions are on them and not anyone else (e.g. 2 Corinthians 5:10).

The sinful choices and actions were not inevitable. They were made by a person with agency. So, the question becomes whether or not the cheater will choose repentance and turn from making those choices.

Will he or she make amends for what was destroyed by his or her sinful choices and destructive agency? Is the cheater willing to reject a set of values or narrative that in anyway says such actions are acceptable or were unavoidable (when they actually were)?

Good News: A cheater does not have to remain in “toxic shame.”

Bad News: A cheater only escapes “toxic shame” by facing and owning his/her sins and truly repenting.

For without repentance, we remain in our sins with spiritual death being the final outcome (e.g. Hebrews 10:26-27). So, it does neither the cheater nor the adultery victim any good to give into the “toxic shame” excuse of shutting down the repentance work. That is precisely what Satan wants to happen.

 

2 thoughts on ““Toxic Shame” Excuse”

  1. My ex actually said something similar during the wreckage of our divorce. “I’m a whore.” She said this with no intention of stopping her adultery and in fact said I was “pushing her’ when I told her if she wants to save the marriage she needed to stop right then and there. She ended up going out of town that weekend with the OM.

    To add to what DM posted, the whole “toxic shame” thing is an attempt by the cheater to communicate indirectly that there is something going on that is bigger than them which they can’t control. It’s tries to have the faithful spouse arrive at the conclusion that the cheater is actually the victim and their crime is not out of agency. Its manipulation by sympathy that would, at the same time, absolve the cheater of their sin. It is very shrew. The fact that counselors and pastors would support this line of thinking is atrocious.

    And here’s the kicker: this is a practiced behavior; at least for my ex it was. I found out later that she has pulled this play on more than just me. Not only did she not repent, she improved her game of sinning.

  2. “It’s tries to have the faithful spouse arrive at the conclusion that the cheater is actually the victim and their crime is not out of agency. Its manipulation by sympathy that would, at the same time, absolve the cheater of their sin”
    Oh boy, does that sound familiar!
    Now that the marriage has been destroyed for 15 years she says “I am not like that anymore.”
    Still avoiding accountability.

Comments are closed.